[m-rev.] for review: changes to mmake and bootcheck

Zoltan Somogyi zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Tue Jun 18 20:40:20 AEST 2019


For review by anyone.

For the diff to mmake, the main question is the parsing cost of the spaces.

For bootcheck, my question is not really about the diff, but whether we should
build the slice, profiler, deep_profiler and mfilterjavac directories in stage 3?
At the moment, we do not, so we do not compare them to stage 2. I think
we (I) should fix this. Any objections?

Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.bc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 158 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20190618/56942e8a/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.bc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1349 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20190618/56942e8a/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.mmake
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 233 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20190618/56942e8a/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.mmake
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6454 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20190618/56942e8a/attachment-0003.obj>


More information about the reviews mailing list