[m-rev.] Re: for review: don't make asm label functions static

[Ian MacLarty]

On Thursday, July 8, 2010, Julien Fischer <juliensf at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Ian MacLarty wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Paul Bone <pbone at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 12:17:33PM +1000, Ian MacLarty wrote:
>
> For review by anyone.
>
>
>
> Thanks Ian,
>
> Julien and I are happy with this.  Could you also bootcheck it using GCC 3.4?
> We have gcc-3.4 installed on taura.
>
>
>
> Bootcheck with gcc-3.4 passes, so I've committed this.
>
>
> rotd-2010-07-07 is very broken on x86-64 in the asm_fast.gc grades, (the
> generated executables seg fault when initialising the standard library.)
> This is presumably what PeterW mentioned yesterday afternoon.
>
> What optimization options did you bootcheck with?  It appears that
> everything is fine at -O2, but the nightly builds are broken on the
> following machines:
>
>         taura           gcc 4.4         -O5 --intermod-opt
>         goliath         gcc 4.1         -O5 --intermod-opt
>         neptune         gcc 4.1         -O4
>         saturn          gcc 4.3         -O5 --intermod-opt
>
> The only one of the x86-64 machines on which it is working is goofy,
> which builds at -O2 (it's also gcc 4.1).
>

I checked at the default (-O2 I believe) using gcc-4.3 and gcc-3.4 on
a 32 bit machine.

Ian.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------