[m-rev.] for review: enable `il' grade

[Fergus Henderson]

On 22-Oct-2002, Peter Ross <pro at missioncriticalit.com> wrote:
> > Peter Ross, any comments on this one?
> 
> I have looked into this further.
> 
> I would hold off on this for awhile.

I had already committed it after seeing your previous mail.

It would be possible to revert it, of course, but I don't think that is
worthwhile.  Better to just fix the bugs in the il grade.

> The best test case that I have for
> this one is a test application we are developing that is a workflow
> engine.  It currently runs in the ilc grade.  I have yet been able to
> test it on the il grade (I had only just succeeded in compiling the
> library in the il grade when I went on holidays).  When I can build this
> application then I think that would be the time to switch to making il
> the default.  Hopefully that is soon.

By all means go ahead and test your application

However, since the sources for this test are not publically available,
I don't think that is a good criteria for deciding when we should make
il grade the default.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------