[mercury-users] Thank you, but ... Re: Alternate XML-representation for terms (non-XSLT)?

[Ian MacLarty]

On 31 Jan 2006, at 18:28, doug.auclair at logicaltypes.com wrote:

> Dear Ian,
>
> Thank you for the references; I've downloaded the ROTD and will look 
> into the typeclass and examples there.  I hope these examples can 
> eventuate in code that works on the current release, as this may have 
> application in a production system, and the client may, or may not, 
> care that the underlying compiler is in alpha release (usually the 
> uppermost concern of my clients are simple: that I deliver a working 
> system to them).
>
> It would be nice that this code, if it appears to benefit the 
> term_to_xml module (primus non nocere), be moved into a stable release 
> delivery.  Any plans on this?
>

It will be in 0.13, but not in 0.12.x.  I think we're planning to fork 
the 0.13 branch quite soon, though when it gets released is another 
matter.

Julien (or anyone else), is there a schedule for the next release?

Ian.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-users mailing list
post:  mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------