[mercury-users] foreign_decl vs. foreign_code
Tyson Dowd
trd at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Tue Feb 12 17:35:31 AEDT 2002
On 12-Feb-2002, Michael Day <mikeday at bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
> > You can put #ifdefs around it to make sure it doesn't get defined multiple
> > times.
> >
> > I believe I argued that this (or something similar) was a bug some time
> > ago, and lost.
This statement of mine is not right -- I was arguing about something
a bit different -- whether multiple foreign_decls should be duplicated
or merged. It's not relevant to this problem.
> Looks like a bug to me, either in the implementation or failing that in
> the documentation:
>
> Definitions of foreign language entities (such as functions or global
> variables) may be included using a declaration of the form...
>
> The documentation goes on to describe it as being linked in, which
> certainly makes it sound like it shouldn't be duplicated. And as to the
I think this is documentation for foreign_code, not foreign_decl.
But foreign_code should not be duplicated, foreign_decls can be
duplicated (e.g. they can be included in multiple places).
> problem manifested in asm_fast.gc grade:
>
> Entities declared in `pragma foreign_code' declarations are visible in
> `pragma foreign_proc' declarations that specify the same foreign
> language and occur in in the same Mercury module.
>
> So, something is wrong.
I believe this piece of documentation is wrong, this is not true.
Entities declared in foreign_code might not be visible at all.
Tyson.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-users mailing list
post: mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the users
mailing list