[m-rev.] for post-commit review: split possible_cause into hint and inconsistent
Zoltan Somogyi
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Wed Jun 12 00:31:33 AEST 2024
On 2024-06-11 17:42 +10:00 AEST, "Peter Wang" <novalazy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:41:21 +1000 Peter Wang <novalazy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'll try to make suggestions for the 256 color modes soon.
>
> Here are my suggestions for the 256 color modes.
>
> dark256
> specified at subject=111:correct=107:incorrect=174:inconsistent=179:hint=140
>
> light256
> specified at subject=27:correct=28:incorrect=160:inconsistent=166:hint=92
>
> where
>
> color 111: #87afff rgb(135, 175, 255) oklch(0.76, 0.124, 263)
> color 107: #87af5f rgb(135, 175, 95) oklch(0.71, 0.117, 131)
> color 174: #d78787 rgb(215, 135, 135) oklch(0.71, 0.099, 20)
> color 179: #d7af5f rgb(215, 175, 95) oklch(0.77, 0.109, 83)
> color 140: #af87d7 rgb(175, 135, 215) oklch(0.69, 0.122, 306)
>
> color 27: #005fff rgb( 0, 95, 255) oklch(0.55, 0.249, 262)
> color 28: #008700 rgb( 0, 135, 0) oklch(0.54, 0.184, 142)
> color 160: #d70000 rgb(215, 0, 0) oklch(0.55, 0.227, 29)
> color 166: #d75f00 rgb(215, 95, 0) oklch(0.63, 0.172, 48)
> color 92: #8700d7 rgb(135, 0, 215) oklch(0.50, 0.261, 304)
Thanks for that. Sorry to be a pest, but while this info is still in your head,
could you please pick 24 bit colors for each role? The attached diff, which I am
committing, adds support for them. I think it is simple enough not to need review,
but I wouldn't mind being corrected.
Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.c24
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20240612/f50ae8e9/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.c24
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 8770 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20240612/f50ae8e9/attachment-0001.obj>
More information about the reviews
mailing list