[m-rev.] for review: module_add_type_defn

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 21:44:57 +1000 (AEST), "Zoltan Somogyi" <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> > > And should it be an error to declare (not define) a type in both
> > > the interface and the implementation section of a module?
> > 
> > It's an error for predicate declarations, so I suppose for consistency
> > it ought to be for types as well.  (Note that typeclass and instance
> > declarations in both the interface and implementation are also both
> > also currently allowed.)
> 
> If noone objects, I will do this soon as well.

Done by this diff.

Zoltan.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.dup_abs
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 425 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20170629/e475af2d/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.dup_abs
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 7496 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20170629/e475af2d/attachment-0001.obj>