[m-rev.] for review: document the uint type
Julien Fischer
jfischer at opturion.com
Thu Jun 8 23:54:38 AEST 2017
Hi Zoltan,
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Zoltan Somogyi wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 22:07:33 +1000 (AEST), Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
>> In the current implementation, @code{MR_Integer} is a typedef for a signed
>> integral type whose size is the same size as a pointer of type @samp{void *};
>> + at code{MR_Unsigned} is a typedef for an unsigned integral type whose size is the
>> +same as a pointer of type @samp{void *};
>
> I would change the wording of both the old and new sentences to say
> "is a typedef for an signed/unsigned integral type which is the same size as ...".
Done.
> The rest of the diff is fine.
Thanks for the review.
Julien.
More information about the reviews
mailing list