[m-rev.] for review: document the uint type
Zoltan Somogyi
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Thu Jun 8 22:49:22 AEST 2017
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 22:07:33 +1000 (AEST), Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> In the current implementation, @code{MR_Integer} is a typedef for a signed
> integral type whose size is the same size as a pointer of type @samp{void *};
> + at code{MR_Unsigned} is a typedef for an unsigned integral type whose size is the
> +same as a pointer of type @samp{void *};
I would change the wording of both the old and new sentences to say
"is a typedef for an signed/unsigned integral type which is the same size as ...".
The rest of the diff is fine.
Zoltan.
More information about the reviews
mailing list