[m-rev.] for review: delete or deprecate obsolete builtin insts, modes and predicates

[Julien Fischer]

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Paul Bone wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:51:51PM +1100, Julien Fischer wrote:
>
>> @@ -201,9 +197,10 @@
>>      % assumption is not satisfied, the behaviour is undefined. (If you lie
>>      % to the compiler, the compiler will get its revenge!)
>>      %
>> -    % NOTE: we recommend using the a `promise_equivalent_solutions' goal
>> -    %       instead of this function.
>> +    % NOTE: This function is deprecated and will be removed in a future
>> +    % release.  Use a `promise_equivalent_solutions' goal instead.
>>      %
>
> The only thing I would change is the indentation in these comments, to make
> it like the originals.  That's just a preference though.  I'd prefer not to
> start a discussion about this.

Ok, I've changed indentation.

Julien.