[m-rev.] for review: delete or deprecate obsolete builtin insts, modes and predicates
paul at bone.id.au
Thu Dec 3 10:52:00 AEDT 2015
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:51:51PM +1100, Julien Fischer wrote:
> For review by anyone.
> This has been discussed on the developers list, the main thing for review is
> the documentation changes.
This looks okay.
> @@ -201,9 +197,10 @@
> % assumption is not satisfied, the behaviour is undefined. (If you lie
> % to the compiler, the compiler will get its revenge!)
> - % NOTE: we recommend using the a `promise_equivalent_solutions' goal
> - % instead of this function.
> + % NOTE: This function is deprecated and will be removed in a future
> + % release. Use a `promise_equivalent_solutions' goal instead.
The only thing I would change is the indentation in these comments, to make
it like the originals. That's just a preference though. I'd prefer not to
start a discussion about this.
More information about the reviews