[m-rev.] for review: delete or deprecate obsolete builtin insts, modes and predicates

[Paul Bone]

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:51:51PM +1100, Julien Fischer wrote:
> 
> For review by anyone.
> 
> This has been discussed on the developers list, the main thing for review is
> the documentation changes.

This looks okay.

> @@ -201,9 +197,10 @@
>      % assumption is not satisfied, the behaviour is undefined. (If you lie
>      % to the compiler, the compiler will get its revenge!)
>      %
> -    % NOTE: we recommend using the a `promise_equivalent_solutions' goal
> -    %       instead of this function.
> +    % NOTE: This function is deprecated and will be removed in a future
> +    % release.  Use a `promise_equivalent_solutions' goal instead.
>      %

The only thing I would change is the indentation in these comments, to make
it like the originals.  That's just a preference though.  I'd prefer not to
start a discussion about this.

-- 
Paul Bone