[m-rev.] for review: fix a comment

[Julien Fischer]

On Mon, 2 May 2011, Julien Fischer wrote:

>
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Ian MacLarty wrote:
>
>> For review by anyone.
>> 
>> Branches: main
>> 
>> Change the comment describing the behaviour of parsing_utils.separated_list 
>> to
>> match its actual behaviour.
>> 
>> I didn't change the behaviour to match the comment, because the test case
>> already tests that the predicate fails for empty sequences,
>
> That behaviour seems odd - I suspect the test case is wrong.
>
>> so that seems likely to have been the intended behaviour.
>
> There are two predicates named separated_list in this module.   You have
> only changed the documentation for one of them.

Also, it is now inconsistent with that of comma_separated_list.

Julien.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------