[m-rev.] for review: parser.m profiling

[Fergus Henderson]

On 15-Mar-2003, Zoltan Somogyi <zs at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> On 14-Mar-2003, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > I think it might be better to just change parser.m to use field notation
> > to access the fields, and then add an option to the compiler to have all
> > field access go via automatically-generated field access functions.
> > This option could be useful for both profiling and for debugging.
> 
> I agree that would be a good idea for the future. This diff is a step towards
> that. Changing parser.m to use field notation was the hardish part of the
> diff, because the old code depended on complicated data flow through
> unifications that cannot be done with field notation.

Fair enough.  If you want to commit this as is for now, I don't have
any objection to it.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------