[m-rev.] for review: parser.m profiling

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On 14-Mar-2003, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> I think it might be better to just change parser.m to use field notation
> to access the fields, and then add an option to the compiler to have all
> field access go via automatically-generated field access functions.
> This option could be useful for both profiling and for debugging.

I agree that would be a good idea for the future. This diff is a step towards
that. Changing parser.m to use field notation was the hardish part of the
diff, because the old code depended on complicated data flow through
unifications that cannot be done with field notation.

Zoltan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------