[m-rev.] diff: fix sub-module build problem
Peter Ross
peter.ross at miscrit.be
Fri Nov 16 02:45:07 AEDT 2001
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:36:54AM +1100, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> On 16-Nov-2001, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > On 16-Nov-2001, Simon Taylor <stayl at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd suggest leaving this change for now.
> >
> > That might be a good idea.
> > But Pete, you can certainly go ahead and add the test cases now
> > (so long as they are not enabled, of course).
>
> Well, on further investigation it appears that both the current Mercury
> compiler and Mercury 0.10 already pass the test case that you added.
> So (a) you can go ahead and enable it (the test is useful since it is
> testing something different than the other sub-module tests),
> but (b) you should come up with a different test case that
> actually demonstrates the problem, if there is a problem.
>
It doesn't pass it on my system.
$ make --version
GNU Make version 3.79.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath.
Built for i686-pc-cygwin
Copyright (C) 1988, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS
FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Report bugs to <bug-make at gnu.org>.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list