[m-rev.] diff: fix sub-module build problem

[Fergus Henderson]

On 16-Nov-2001, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> On 16-Nov-2001, Simon Taylor <stayl at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > 
> > I'd suggest leaving this change for now.
> 
> That might be a good idea.
> But Pete, you can certainly go ahead and add the test cases now
> (so long as they are not enabled, of course).

Well, on further investigation it appears that both the current Mercury
compiler and Mercury 0.10 already pass the test case that you added.
So (a) you can go ahead and enable it (the test is useful since it is
testing something different than the other sub-module tests),
but (b) you should come up with a different test case that
actually demonstrates the problem, if there is a problem.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------