[m-rev.] field syntax (was: smart recompilation)

[Ralph Becket]

> From: Tyson Dowd [mailto:trd at cs.mu.OZ.AU]
> Sent: 05 July 2001 11:03
> 
> I believe it would make very little difference to your
> coding style if ^ was reserved for field selection, '= field_name' was
> the field getter function, and there was some other reverse order
> function application operator you could use to your hearts content.
> But I would be able to look at such code and understand it much more
> quickly.

Sounds good to me.  Have we reached a state of violent agreement?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------