[m-rev.] field syntax (was: smart recompilation)
Ralph Becket
rbeck at microsoft.com
Thu Jul 5 19:53:48 AEST 2001
> From: Tyson Dowd [mailto:trd at cs.mu.OZ.AU]
> Sent: 05 July 2001 10:43
> >
> > Another option is not to adjust the names of setters either and just
> > use arity overloading.
>
> Yes, but this gives you even *less* information!
I wasn't being serious - just trying to make a point!
> We could just delete the whole field selection syntax section from
> the documentation altogether and stop pretending we have anything
other
> than some function application syntax.
God, no. Not having to write all that boilerplate is a real timesaver
and the improvement in code readability is well worth it alone.
- Ralph
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list