[m-rev.] for review: transparent sub-modules

[Simon Taylor]

On 03-Dec-2001, Peter Ross <peter.ross at miscrit.be> wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> > We currently don't imply that transparent sub-modules always have to
> be
> > used.  The change is trivial to do.  I am waiting for someone to
> provide
> > feedback on the alternative suggestion that I provided.
> >
> Anyone going to review this change?

We don't have agreement on whether it should be allowed yet.

Simon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------