[m-rev.] for review: transparent sub-modules

[Peter Ross]

Peter wrote:
> We currently don't imply that transparent sub-modules always have to
be
> used.  The change is trivial to do.  I am waiting for someone to
provide
> feedback on the alternative suggestion that I provided.
>
Anyone going to review this change?

And are there any comments on my suggestion about only having to fully
qualify names up to the level of the import_module declaration?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------