[m-dev.] Re: mercury: should this package be removed?
pbone at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Wed Feb 20 11:24:55 AEDT 2008
On 20/02/2008, at 10:00 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I've removed the bug addresses for now so there isn't too much
> garbage on Debian's BTS.
> I'm testing a build of mercury 0.13.1 right now with gcc-4.1. So
> far it's building. I can probably help you get a minimal package
> going just to get started.
> The current package does some crazy stuff that I've ripped out for
> now just to see if I can get it building.
> If I can get something working I'll send you my debian/ dir.
> BTW, the upstream tarball should not include a debian/ dir, nor any
> CVS dirs.
> Barry deFreese
Neat. I look forward to seeing what you can achieve.
I'm interested in versioning this along with other mercury things,
perhaps as a separate CVS module. This is convenient for me but I
don't know how it might be for others that may help maintain the
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the developers