[m-dev.] Re: mercury: should this package be removed?

Paul Bone pbone at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Wed Feb 20 11:24:55 AEDT 2008


On 20/02/2008, at 10:00 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I've removed the bug addresses for now so there isn't too much  
> garbage on Debian's BTS.
>
> I'm testing a build of mercury 0.13.1 right now with gcc-4.1.  So  
> far it's building.  I can probably help you get a minimal package  
> going just to get started.
>
> The current package does some crazy stuff that I've ripped out for  
> now just to see if I can get it building.
>
> If I can get something working I'll send you my debian/ dir.
>
> BTW, the upstream tarball should not include a debian/ dir, nor any  
> CVS dirs.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Barry deFreese

Neat.  I look forward to seeing what you can achieve.

I'm interested in versioning this along with other mercury things,  
perhaps as a separate CVS module.  This is convenient for me but I  
don't know how it might be for others that may help maintain the  
package.

Cheers.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/developers/attachments/20080220/1fe27dad/attachment.sig>


More information about the developers mailing list