[m-dev.] [reuse] fixes of some naughty bugs

[Ralph Becket]

> From: Nancy Mazur [mailto:Nancy.Mazur at cs.kuleuven.ac.be]
> Sent: 13 March 2001 07:24
> > >
> > > Euhm, the analysis is still adjacent to the di/uo inference.
> >
> > What do you both mean by "adjacent" in this context?
> 
> I had to puzzle it out of the sentence too ;-)
> Somehow parallel, complementary. My reuse analysis is not based
> on any di/uo inference, and the di/uo inference (although it could)
> is not using any of my reuse analysis.

My original phrase was "not unadjacent", so we're in agreement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------