[m-dev.] for review: new debugger command set (part 2 of 4)

[Mark Anthony BROWN]

Hi,

> > + at node Tracing of Mercury programs
> > + at section Tracing of Mercury programs
> > +
> > +The Mercury debugger is based on a modified version of the box model
> > +on which the four-port debuggers of most Prolog systems are based.
> > +Such debuggers abstract the execution of a program
> > +into a sequence or @emph{trace} of execution events of various kinds.
> 
> s/or/of
> s/of/or
> 
> (you'll know what I mean when you read it).
> 

That depends on how we wish to define the word ``trace''.  Which of the
following should be considered correct usage?

i) ... a trace of execution events ...
ii) ... a sequence of trace events ...

If i) then then text could stay as it is; if ii) then it should change.

Cheers,
Mark
-- 
Mark Brown  (dougl at cs.mu.oz.au)           |  Let's talk about tax, baby
MEngSc student,                     )O+   |  Let's talk about GST
Dept of Computer Science                  |  Let's make a wider gap twixt
University of Melbourne                   |  Affluence and po-ver-ty ...