[m-dev.] diff/for review: changes to runtime for non-gcc C compilers
Fergus Henderson
fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Wed Jul 15 17:10:34 AEST 1998
On 15-Jul-1998, Tyson Dowd <trd at stimpy.cs.mu.oz.au> wrote:
> > -Word *
> > +static Word *
> > deep_copy_type_info(Word *type_info, Word *lower_limit, Word *upper_limit)
> > {
> > if (in_range(type_info)) {
>
> XXX check this in my change.
?
> > - MR_MAKE_STACK_LAYOUT_ENTRY(engine_done);
> > + MR_MAKE_STACK_LAYOUT_ENTRY(engine_done)
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to leave the semicolon off the macro definition
> than all the uses? Otherwise people are just going to add new ones
> with semicolons anyway.
The trouble with that is that the macro expands to nothing if
stack layouts are not enabled.
I could change it to expand to something like
`extern int MR_unused_bogus_variable' instead of nothing.
But that seemed like a bit of a hack to me.
> > + #define hp_alloc_atomic(count) \
> > + incr_hp_atomic(LVALUE_CAST(Word, MR_hp), (count)), \
> > + MR_hp += (count), \
> > + (void)0 \
> > + )
>
> The parentheses don't match in hp_alloc_atomic. Should there be a '('
> after hp_alloc_atomic(count)?
Oops, yes. Thanks. I'll fix that.
> > +/* XXX should move this to mercury_tabling.c */
>
> Were you intending to do this in this diff?
Nope, that one isn't a portability fix, so I thought it was best
to leave that for a separate change.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh at 128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
More information about the developers
mailing list