[m-dev.] diff: fixes for demangling
Tyson Richard DOWD
trd at cs.mu.oz.au
Thu Jul 24 17:03:34 AEST 1997
Fergus Henderson wrote:
> Tyson Richard DOWD, you wrote:
> >
> > > + ( remove_prefix("__Unify__") ->
> > > + { Category = unify }
> > > + ; remove_prefix("__Compare__") ->
> > > + { Category = compare },
> > > + { ModeNum = 0 } % sanity check
> > > + ; remove_prefix("__Index__") ->
> > > + { Category = index },
> > > + { ModeNum = 0 } % sanity check
> > > + ;
> > > + { Category = ordinary }
> > > + ),
> >
> > I don't know whether "sanity check" is the right comment. If it's a
> > sanity check, they should use require. Instead, it rejects them as a
> > pred symbol, and doesn't demangle them.
>
> It shouldn't use require, because the input could be any old random junk,
> and calling error/1 merely because the user gave us the wrong input is
> undesirable behaviour.
As long as it isn't a pred that just happens to look like a special pred
- but I don't think we can generate them very easily so it isn't a
problem.
--
Tyson Dowd # 4.4: People keep saying the behavior is undefined,
# but I just tried it on an ANSI-conforming compiler
trd at cs.mu.oz.au # and got the results I expected.
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd # A: They were wrong. Flame them mercilessly. C-IAQ
More information about the developers
mailing list