[m-users.] CSHARP grade for .Net Framework 2.0
Maxime Van Assche
mva at missioncriticalit.com
Thu May 23 18:01:27 AEST 2013
On 23/05/2013 09:54, Julien Fischer wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013, Maxime Van Assche wrote:
>> On 23/05/2013 06:19, John Adams wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity, What is the maturity level of C# Back-end? Can it be used for production level?
>> Mission Critical has used intensively the C# Back-end, and considered it reliable (Mono and MS .Net 3.5/4.0).
>> In terms of performance, there is probably fine tuning to be done, as we have noticed that it is not as efficient as
>> the Java back-end, for instance.
> Is that a difference between the code generated between the two backends
> or simply the difference between .NET and the JVM though?
We never got to analyze that far in comparison.
However, the generated code between Java and C# back-end are pretty much equivalent.
If I recall correctly, there was a relatively expensive component in the runtime (around type descriptor, I think).
More information about the users