[m-rev.] for review: allow pragmas to accept pred() and func() wrappers around symname/arity
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Thu May 6 07:18:16 AEST 2021
On Wed, 5 May 2021 21:02:17 +1000 (AEST), Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> It might also be worth replacing int with uint at some point, since arities
> cannot be negative. (Actually, given the documented limitations on the
> arities of predicates, uint16 might be a better choice since that may also
> result in opportunities for argument packing in some of the compiler data
I added a comment about this.
> The diff looks ok.
Thank you. I was busy yesterday with other things, so I will add
the invalid tests after committing this.
More information about the reviews