[m-rev.] for review: better error messages for lambda exprs

Peter Wang novalazy at gmail.com
Wed May 18 10:36:46 AEST 2016


On Wed, 18 May 2016 04:22:40 +1000 (AEST), "Zoltan Somogyi" <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> 
> Are there any objections to commiting the changes
> to the parsing of the lambda expressions only,
> without the changes to the parsing of @, ^, := etc?

Not from me.

Peter


More information about the reviews mailing list