[m-rev.] for review: Print version information on two lines.

[Peter Wang]

On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:43:47 +1100, Paul Bone <paul at bone.id.au> wrote:
> 
> I recognize that people feel differently about different column widths.  We
> can have discussions that feel very much like vi vs emacs discussions.  I
> don't want to tell anyone that 80 columns is superior.

Obviously a single vim window 3*80 columns wide is superior ...
until we get even wider screens.

> > If we're going to change the output then perhaps it would be better to
> > just drop the word "configured"?
> > 
> > Mercury Compiler, version rotd-2013-10-01, for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> 
> I don't mind, I don't understand the difference.  If my change is
> unnecessary then this change is also unnecessary.

I didn't say otherwise.  I mooted an alternative way to satisfy your
goal.  It's closer to the old format and IMO it looks better, so I find
it easier to scan visually.  I thought it's worth consideration.

(Scripts were deemed irrelevant -- fine.)

Peter