[m-rev.] for review: fix mantis bug 354

Zoltan Somogyi zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Sat Aug 30 08:47:22 AEST 2014



On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 23:59:44 +1000 (EST), Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> > +:- type table_io_args_data
> > +    --->    table_io_args_data(
> > +                % The number of head variables are stored in the answer
> 
> s/are/that are/

Done.

> > +        value = (MR_Word) MR_make_string_const(
> > +            "the arguments are not available due to the presence of one or more typeclass constraints");
> 
> Are they "typeclass constraints" or "type class constraints"?  The reference
> manual uses the latter.  (The contents of the .err_exp files in tests/invalid
> are divided on the subject.)

I think both are correct, though we tend to use "typeclass constraints"
when differentiating them from other kinds of constraints.

I followed your suggestion here as well.

I am committing this binary incompatible change.

Zoltan.





More information about the reviews mailing list