[m-rev.] for review: fix a comment

Julien Fischer juliensf at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Mon May 2 12:23:49 AEST 2011

On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Ian MacLarty wrote:

> For review by anyone.
> Branches: main
> Change the comment describing the behaviour of parsing_utils.separated_list to
> match its actual behaviour.
> I didn't change the behaviour to match the comment, because the test case
> already tests that the predicate fails for empty sequences,

That behaviour seems odd - I suspect the test case is wrong.

> so that seems likely to have been the intended behaviour.

There are two predicates named separated_list in this module.   You have
only changed the documentation for one of them.

mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au

More information about the reviews mailing list