[m-rev.] for review: deconstruct.named_arg for java

Julien Fischer juliensf at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Thu Jul 15 01:07:39 AEST 2010


On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Ian MacLarty wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Zoltan Somogyi <zs at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>> On 14-Jul-2010, Ian MacLarty <maclarty at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>>> That doesn't appear to solve the problem.  The function is actually
>>> used.  What is needed is a "defined" attribute to convince gcc that
>>> the function is actually defined.
>>
>> Since the state of things as they were before all this started actually
>> worked, I think gcc was sufficiently convinced already.
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean.  As far as I know gcc 4.x has always
> emitted these warnings for the code generated in asm_fast.gc.

It has certainly always emitted them from gcc 4.1 onwards.  (4.0 was too
broken on most platforms for us to either notice or care.)

Julien.


More information about the reviews mailing list