[m-rev.] for review: make java grade not imply intermodule optimisation

Peter Wang novalazy at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 15:20:51 AEST 2009


2009/6/12 Julien Fischer <juliensf at csse.unimelb.edu.au>:
>
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Peter Wang wrote:
>
>> Bootchecked in hlc.gc.
>
> Please also check hl.gc.

Passed.  tabling tests fail because tabling isn't supported then.

>> Successfully compiled and ran Mercury compiler and
>> minizinc tools in java grade without intermodule optimisation.
>
> Last I checked, mzn2fzn didn't compile in the java grade.  Is that not
> the case anymore?  (I guess if intermodule optimiztion is not enabled
> then maybe the bytecode for that big predicate doesn't exceed the limit
> on method sizes?)

I should have written the minizinc tools that are known to work.  mzn2fzn still
doesn't compile, but it's worth half a point as javac couldn't find anything
else to criticise ;-)

Peter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the reviews mailing list