[m-rev.] for review: version array reimplementation

[Peter Wang]

On 2009-07-27, Ralph Becket <rafe at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> 
> If I recall correctly, my implementation should have ensured that the
> latest version of the array was always represented as a base/1 value,
> giving the O(1) properties.  Was there a bug in the code?

Oops, sorry, I misunderstood your code.  Still, something is causing it
to perform a lot worse than my version.  Let me try and see why that is.

Peter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------