[m-rev.] for conceptual review: standardizing on one type naming convention

[Julien Fischer]

On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Zoltan Somogyi wrote:

> The runtime had two different conventions for naming types. One convention,
> used mostly in the debugger-related modules, added underscores between
> capitalized words; example: MR_Label_Layout. The other convention, used
> in most modules, used capitalized words without underscores (e.g. MR_TypeInfo).
>
> This diff standardizes on the second convention. It has no algorithmic changes,
> only renames of types.

That looks fine (conceptually).

Julien.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------