[m-rev.] For review: allow declarative debugger to search upward from initial symptom

[Ian MacLarty]

>>>> The
>>>> +next question should be about the call that bound the term at 
>>>> which point you
>>> s/should/will/?
>>>> +could issue a @samp{pd} command to return to the procedural 
>>>> debugger at the
>>>> +final event of the call that bound the term.
>>>>
>>> It seems like two sentences have run into each other there.  I 
>>> suggest
>>> splitting that sentence up.
>>>
>> I've changes it to:
>>
>> The next question should be about the call that bound the term.  
>> Issue a
>> @samp{pd} command at this point to return to the procedural debugger 
>> at the
>> final event of the call that bound the term.
>>
> I think the last sentence should be something like:
>
> 	Issue a @samp{pd} command to return to the procedural debugger.
> 	It will now show the final event of the call that bound the
> 	term.
>
Okay.

Ian.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------