[m-rev.] for review: predicate equivalence type and inst declarations

[David Overton]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:49:00PM +1100, Simon Taylor wrote:
> 
> Estimated hours taken: 40
> Branches: main
> 
> Allow declarations of the form
> :- pred p `with_type` higher_order_type `with_inst` higher_order_inst.

When we start using `:' for type qualification, it would be nice to
support syntax something like this:

	:- pred p : higher_order_type :: higher_order_inst.

Is there any reason why `::' couldn't be used instead of `with_inst'
now?


David
-- 
David Overton      Computer Science and Software Engineering
PhD Student        The University of Melbourne   +61 3 8344 9159
Research Fellow    Monash University (Clayton)   +61 3 9905 5779
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------