[m-rev.] Extend recognition of field access syntax

Peter Moulder pmoulder at csse.monash.edu.au
Wed Dec 18 14:20:46 AEDT 2002


On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:30:40PM +1100, Ralph Becket wrote:

>  @example
> -:- func increment_field3(type1) = type1.
> +:- func type1 ~ increment_field3 = type1.
                ^^^
Presumably a typo.  (`~' doesn't occur elsewhere in the patch, and isn't
mentioned in reference_manual.texi other than as a unary operator.)

> +++ hard_coded/field_syntax.m
> ...
> 	io.format(...)

I'm guessing this is fine, but just in case, I'll mention that nothing
in the head brach that I can see uses `.' syntax yet, and using `.'
hinders bootstrapping.  Just thought I'd mention it.

pjm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the reviews mailing list