[m-users.] Comparison in the reference manual
Julien Fischer
jfischer at opturion.com
Mon Nov 9 10:50:33 AEDT 2015
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Peter Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:09:27 +1100, Paul Bone <paul at bone.id.au> wrote:
>>
>> While answering a question on IRC I tried to find the relevant part in the
>> reference manual for comparison. Specifically that the order of functors in
>> a type declaration is significant. But I could not find it.
>>
>> Is this written down somewhere?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Only implicitly, as far as I am aware.
It's written down in compiler/unify_proc.m, but that's not really
something you should be pointing users at. ;-)
> Under "Using foreign enumerations in Mercury code" it states:
>
> Note that the default comparison for types that are the subject of a
> `pragma foreign_enum' declaration will be defined by the foreign
> values, rather than the order of the constructors in the type
> declaration (as is usually the case).
>
> In README.Erlang I wrote:
>
> * Discriminated union values are ordered according to Erlang conventions
> (e.g. alphabetically) instead of according to the order that data
> constructors appear in the type definition.
>
> I think the standard ordering should be described in the chapter on
> discriminated unions.
Agreed. (I remember looking for such a section when I wrote the
reference manual section on foreign enumerations.)
Julien.
More information about the users
mailing list