[mercury-users] Empty conjuncts?

[Ralph Becket]

Peter Hawkins, Friday, 22 July 2005:
> Hi...
> 
> Would it be possible to relax mercury's syntax a little, and allow empty 
> elements in conjunctions? In other words, this should be valid:

I'd vote against that change, aesthetically speaking.  Honestly, do you
really spend that much time fixing comma bugs?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-users mailing list
post:  mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------