[mercury-users] undefined symbol `::/2'.

[Tomas By]

Richard A. O'Keefe writes:
> I wrote:
> 	> Amongst other things, this meant that between(0,N) could be passed
> 	> around usefully as a closure in Prolog.  While that advantage does
> 	> not apply to Mercury,
> Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> 	Why not?
> 	
> Because Mercury doesn't need it.  Mercury has much better ways to
> construct higher-order terms than Prolog's "drop the trailing
> arguments" hack.

but the advantage still applies. ie you cannot curry away the thing in
the middle

/Tomas
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-users mailing list
post:  mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------