[mercury-users] Syntactic sugar for higher order types and mo des

[Michael Day]

> "Use of : for module name resolution is an affront to good taste, says Ralph."
> in defiance of Common Lisp, Prolog, Erlang, and XML, amongst others.

Does that make C++ twice as taste::less? How about perl?
Would be nice not to mingle type and module qualification though.

Michael

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-users mailing list
post:  mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------