[mercury-users] Recursive lambdas
Fergus Henderson
fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Tue Jan 25 10:18:50 AEDT 2000
On 24-Jan-2000, Ralph Becket <rbeck at microsoft.com> wrote:
> The 0.9 compiler's just complained about the following:
>
> ...,
> P = (pred(...) :- <<stuff which includes a recursive call to P>>)
> ...
>
> saying that
>
> atom.m:1275: expected instantiatedness for non-local variables
> atom.m:1275: of lambda goals is `ground'.
>
> I realise this is slightly naughty in terms of the occurs check,
> but for lambdas this seems to be an entirely reasonable thing to
> want to do.
>
> Is there a solution?
The solution is just to use a separate predicate, say `p',
rather than using a lambda expression:
...,
P = p(...),
...
p(...) :- <<stuff which includes a recursive call to p>>.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh at 128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-users mailing list
post: mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the users
mailing list