[mercury-users] constructor class syntax

[Robert Ernst Johann JESCHOFNIK]

On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:

> That's a rather unusual perspective:  they are more usually seen
> as "dictionaries" or "tables" rather than "records".  Mercury already
> _has_ dictionaries.  For field access, the "abstract pattern" stuff
> I presented at the Erlang conference last year would adapt to Mercury
> very nicely, and would actually be in the spirit of Mercury.

For those of us both too poor, and too undergraduate to attend these
conferences, would it be possible to have a brief summary? :)

Rob
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-users mailing list
post:  mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------