[mercury-users] Records

[Samuel Sean Watkins]

 > Even better would be a dot.  I know that it is planned to make
 > `.' the module qualifier eventually, but I think it would be
 > a better idea to junk that proposal, keep `:' as a module qualifier,
 > use `::' for types, modes etc. and depreciate `__':

 > Aside from that, I agree, dot would make a better field separator than
 > module separator.  But `@' isn't too bad.

 I suggest go with . because C got this one right.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-users mailing list
post:  mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-users at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-users-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------