[mercury-users] Self-referential data structures
Thomas Charles CONWAY
conway at cs.mu.oz.au
Wed Nov 26 13:32:04 AEDT 1997
Richard A. O'Keefe, you write:
> I am deeply unhappy about this.
I agree.
As a solution to warwick's problem I'd advocate
either using a maybe(key(T)) or having two kinds
of recored stored in the store.
eg
:- type record
---> undefined
; record(
....,
key(record), % next
key(record) % prev
).
You're right this does require a runtime check,
however, I'd much rather some runtime checks than
core-dumps.
On reflection, that amounts to moving the maybe from in the record
to around the record - 6 of one, ....
Thomas
--
ZZ:wq!
^X^C
Thomas Conway conway at cs.mu.oz.au
AD DEUM ET VINUM Every sword has two edges.
More information about the users
mailing list