[m-rev.] for post-commit review: report on more kinds of coerce_fails
Zoltan Somogyi
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Thu Jul 30 21:12:10 AEST 2026
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 13:23:13 +0200 (CEST), "Zoltan Somogyi" <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> > > I can see three possible approaches.
> > >
> > > - never use module qualification
> > > - always use module qualification
> > > - use module qualification only if any module qualification differs
> > > between the from-type and the to-type. (Unlike a type_ctor, a full type
> > > may contain more than one sym_name.)
> > >
> > > I thin the third option is best in balancing the two concerns of
> > >
> > > - presenting information when it can be helpful
> > > - not presenting information when it is not useful, but is only clutter.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > That sounds okay.
>
> I will do this soon.
This diff does that.
Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.diq
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 530 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20260730/356a6256/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.diq
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 15606 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20260730/356a6256/attachment-0003.obj>
More information about the reviews
mailing list