[m-rev.] for post-commit review: uints in edit_seq.m

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On Thu, 1 Jan 2026 17:58:09 +1100, Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> Happy new year!

And to you, and to everyone else on this list.

> On Thu, 1 Jan 2026 at 17:22, Zoltan Somogyi <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> >
> > The concept has been agreed and the diff itself is straightforward.
> > The only part worth reviewing in the entry in NEWS.md. I would also
> > like to know if anyone objects to adding list.ulength, a version of
> > list.length that returns a uint, or if anyone has a better name for it.
> 
> No objections from me, I have thought about adding myself in the past.
> If we are going to go down this road, then map.count, set.count etc should
> also have versions returning uints (e.g. ucount).

Will do. I presume you are ok with the naming scheme of putting a "u" in front
of the predicate and function names?

> > +* This module deals with many integers, including row numbers, column numbers,
> > +  and operation costs) that cannot be negative. To ensure that this restriction
> 
> That parenthesis shouldn't be there.

Fixed, and thanks.

Zoltan.