[m-rev.] for review: update 22.01.9 NEWS
Zoltan Somogyi
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Mon Aug 17 17:57:17 AEST 2026
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:23:33 +1000, Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> +* `calendar.date_from_string/2` and `calendar.duration_from_string/2` now
> + check for integer overflow in their components.
> +
> * We have fixed bugs in the C# and Java implementations of
> `math.unchecked_log2/1` that caused target language compilation errors
> when compiling with `--intermodule-optimisation`.
> @@ -47,6 +50,14 @@ This is a bug-fix release.
> * We have fixed an issue that caused the Microsoft linker to emit
> warning `LNK4001`: "no object files specified; libraries used".
>
> +* We have fixed an incorrect overflow check in `string.to_int/2`,
> + `string.base_string_to_int/3`, `string.to_uint` and
> + `string.base_string_to_uint/3`.
I would switch the second and third names here.
Apart from that, the diff is fine.
I have been getting about a half a dozen bounces from your
email address over the weekend, some for emails that I know
you got because you replied to them. Can you please fix whatever
is causing problems at your end? And if you have a backup email
address, giving it to the rest of us it would simplify communication
in such situations.
In case you did not get the email I sent about how to fix the
interaction between input_spec pragmas and other references
to proc_ids, I am attaching it to this email as well.
Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PROC_PROPOSAL
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 7660 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20260817/08f6c8ff/attachment.obj>
More information about the reviews
mailing list