[m-rev.] for review: proposed reclassification of options

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:21:34 +1000, Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 at 08:15, Zoltan Somogyi <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> > In the absence of a review, or a promise of one, in the next 24 hours,
> > I will assume that noone has any objections to the proposal, and
> > will then construct and commit the full version.
> 
> That looks reasonable to me, with one comment below.

The attached comment does what was agreed.

> The cross_compiling option no longer does anything and is no longer documented.
> Depending on when it was undocumented, it can probably be removed.

What is the dependence?
 
> All of the other "cross compilation" options are also config options.
> (Currently, the way to set up a Mercury cross compiler is by
> setting the values in the configuration script as per tools/configure_cross.)

I added a comment to this effect.

Thanks for the review.

Zoltan.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.oc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20250603/e2b4f915/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.oc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 33243 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20250603/e2b4f915/attachment-0003.obj>